• Home
  • Blog
  • CV
  • Publications
  • Papyrological Resources
  • Contact

On the Green Collection and Private Collectors of Biblical Artifacts

4/29/2014

13 Comments

 
Over the last few years, I have quietly followed the productions and developments of the Green Scholars Initiative (GSI) and the Green Collection, along with the public statements made by those involved with their projects. Back in 2012, I raised questions concerning statements made by one of the former directors of the GSI, Scott Carroll, who no longer works in that capacity. Roberta Mazza has recently raised similar questions. In the post below, I provide some additional information about the Green Collection recently culled from the web. 

In this video, Scott Carroll is interviewed on the Trinity Broadcasting Network, an American evangelical television network. Referring to a cuneiform tablet, the host says to Carroll, “I understand that our mutual benefactor, Jonathan Shipman, actually surprised you this very day and presented this [i.e., the cuneiform tablet] to you.” So, who is Jonathan Shipman? A Google search revealed Shipman’s Linkedin account. Apparently, Shipman was involved in acquiring at least some (if not most) of the Green items. He is president of Shipman Rare Books in Dallas, Texas, and, according to his Linkedin, he has “bought Millions of doallars [sic] in each area of these items also including Antiques and Antiquities, Have purchased over 7,000 Rare signature, From early Americana to early Greek, Syriac, Palestenian [sic] Aramaic, Arabic, and Coptic Papyrus writings of early known written things in the world.” His Linkedin continues: “A historian by research, not a schooled scholar of languages, but expert in the location to purchase of [sic] some of the rarest Books or objects sold in Modern times. Have traveled the globe in search of collections and objects helping lead to creation of several new planned Musuems [sic], and currently represent Museums, Private Collectors, Libraries, and other insitutions [sic] who desire similar things.”

But the Greens apparently cut ties with Shipman. In an interesting article on the Dallas Observer dated 23 August 2010, Jim Schutze reproduces two letters from the Green family indicating that they no longer were dealing with Shipman: “Please be advised that effective August 1, 2010, Mr. Johnny Shipman no longer represents the Green Collection, Mr. Steven T. Green or Dr. Scott Carroll, whether on behalf of the National Bible Museum or any other entity or organization.” The "National Bible Museum" was actually co-founded by Scott Carroll according to this website, and Shipman was the CEO. At least in March 2010, Hobby Lobby was "assisting the National Bible Museum," but by August 1, they had separated. So, what are the reasons for this split? And what are Shipman's sources for purchasing antiquities worth "millions of dollars"? Is the split with Shipman the reason why the Greens decided to establish their Bible museum in Washington D.C. instead of Dallas (Shipman's location), as previously planned? 

On the personal website of Josh McDowell, an American evangelical Christian apologist, there is a very interesting post about an event called "Discover the Evidence," which took place on 5-6 December 2013. At this event, it is said that "each attendee actually participated in the extraction of papyri fragments [sic] from ancient artifacts. This had never been attempted with such a large group before. That was historic!" [NOTE: This quote has since been revised on Josh McDowell's site to the following: "We watched as papyri were carefully extracted from ancient artifacts. That was historic!"] The artifacts may be part of the collections amassed by Carroll, who was a main speaker at this event, since his bio at the bottom of McDowell's article states that "he and his wife have established both the Scott Carroll Manuscripts & Rare Books and a non-profit – The Manuscript Research Group, which provides access to scholars who identify and prepare for publication cuneiform tablets, papyri, Dead Sea Scrolls, biblical manuscripts and Torahs of enormous significance." So, apparently Carroll has now branched off from the Green Collection and Hobby Lobby to create his own collections under the auspices of the "Scott Carroll Manuscripts and Rare Books" and "The Manuscript Research Group." I am very interested in learning more about Carroll's organizations and the "Discover the Evidence" event and what took place there. What did the "extraction of papyri fragments [sic] from ancient artifacts" actually involve? Extraction from what? And why were (non-specialist?) attendees given hands-on access to unpublished artifacts? The article also mentions that "over 50 papyri fragments out of nearly 200 papyri that were discovered have been identified." 200 papyri? Where were they "discovered?" What is their provenance? Were these purchased by/via Shipman? 

From all the videos and articles about the Green Collection (see, for example, this video featuring Carroll), it is clear that the antiquities are being used for apologetic purposes. Consider McDowell's statement about how the new manuscript "discoveries" will be used in this regard:

"These biblical manuscript fragments will be used of God to bring many young people to Christ. I plan to take these manuscripts, scrolls and masks with me as part of the Heroic Truth Experience to help provide an “a-ha” experience for young people and their parents, providing hands-on exposure to ancient evidence for the historical reliability of Scripture. Pray with me that these discoveries will be blessed of God to bring people to Christ and ground believers in the true faith so they can “give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have [in Christ]” (1 Peter 3:15, NIV). It will take several years to publish all these discoveries. We still have about 40 manuscripts to identify, who knows what else we will find?"

Some of the items in the Green collection are part of a traveling exhibition, which Roberta Mazza has just reviewed in light of her own visit to the Verbum Domini II exhibit in Italy. In Mazza's post, she makes reference to the Coptic papyrus of Galatians that I identified on eBay back in 2012. I gave an online "edition" of this papyrus on my old blog, and will soon migrate that post over to this site. On the basis of that edition, this papyrus was registered in the official list of Coptic New Testament manuscripts with the number "sa 399." It is interesting to hear that this papyrus is being featured in the exhibit. I would like to know more about the provenance of this item as well as others that may have been purchased off eBay by the Green Collection. It is hoped that these details will be clearly explained in the publication of such items, including the Coptic papyrus of Galatians, which is apparently "undergoing research" with the GSI. 

The big questions that we are all interested in are: Where are these thousands upon thousands of antiquities coming from, all of a sudden? Who is involved in these transactions? What is the provenance of these cultural artifacts? Will the religious motivations behind the procuration and use of these items restrict academic study of them? I look forward to learning answers to these and similar questions over the coming months.
13 Comments
Timothy Mitchell link
04/29/2014 12:23pm

I hope that at the very least these "non-specialist" groups were supervised by experts in the field. I cringe at the thought of so many priceless papyri being damaged through thoughtless miss-handling.

Reply
Brice C. Jones link
04/29/2014 6:10pm

You and me both, Timothy!

Reply
Robert Kraft link
04/29/2014 1:43pm

Add the fate of the Ferrini eBay offereings to this picture. Ferrini and his associated put hundreds of papyri fragments and related objects up for sale over a period of about 5 years. I purchased some myself, and attempted to monitor the sales once I got involved. See my essay at http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/rak/papyri/ebay/report-2007/report-frame.html.

Reply
Brice C. Jones link
04/29/2014 6:08pm

Thank your comment, Professor Kraft. Indeed, I had you in mind while I was writing this! I know of your work on the Ferrini papyri.

Reply
Daniel Buck
04/29/2014 4:43pm

As far as I know there is only one source for mummy cartonnage, and that is Egypt.
Which basically means these are stolen artifacts.

Reply
Brice C. Jones link
04/29/2014 6:15pm

You are right to say that mummy cartonnage is from Egypt, but I would not immediately jump to the conclusion that "these are stolen artifacts." There is a cutoff date for the purchase of antiquities from Egypt. See the following document: http://tebtunis.berkeley.edu/ASPresolution.pdf.

Reply
Pete
04/30/2014 6:37am

So just to declare an interest, I am involved with a GSI research project (on the Codex Climaci Rescriptus). Some thoughts:

As this post says, Scott Carroll no longer works for the Green Collection; and the Green Collection no longer deals with Jonathan Shipman. (Further the Green Collection has no obvious connection with Josh McDowell.) So the direction of travel of the Green Collection would seem to be clear. Now the Green Collection has an exhibit in collaboration with the Vatican.

Further the Green Collection have encouraged and supported research on their collection which is intended to result in academic publications to disseminate information in normal ways, although this side of the process is not yet very far along and so far only one or two items have been published in academic journals or books.

Of course publication of new material should include whatever information about the provenance and collection history is known. Most particularly all the papyri extracted from one mummy mask or chunk of cartonnage should be identified as in that sense belonging together - to lose the knowledge of their association in time and space would be academically tragic. [But no different in principle from what we lost by the way Grenfell & Hunt operated in Oxyrhynchus.]

The Green Collection is also pretty upfront about the academic consultants they are using. The real issue, it seems to me, is that for whatever reason, most of their consultants do not appear to be "provenance purists" in relation to ancient artifacts.

Reply
Roberta Mazza link
04/30/2014 11:55am

I have asked publicly and privately information on acquisition circumstances of two specific pieces,GC.MS.000462 (Galatians 2) and P. GC. inv. 105 (Sappho fragments), to the current director of the Museum of the Bible, David Trobisch, and haven't received any answer yet (but this can take a bit). He is very, very different from Scott Carroll and committed to transparency. What Pete writes ('The real issue ... is that for whatever reason, most of their consultants do not appear to be "provenance purists" in relation to ancient artefacts) seems reasonable. Therefore I am now confident we will be given information about these two pieces soon, and maybe the GSI director will suggest his collaborators to provide information on the modern history of the artefacts in future publications.

Reply
Brice C. Jones link
04/30/2014 11:59am

Thanks, Pete (Head, I am assuming). Since you are working with the GSI, can you say more about the consultants they are using? Also, you mention extracting papyri from "one mummy mask or chunk of cartonnage." Do you know anything about such items and where they come from?

"Further the Green Collection have encouraged and supported research on their collection." I am interested in their mentor/mentee program. It seems from what I have heard that much of their encouragement and support is for those involved on the inside, persons selected and/or approved (?) by the GSI.

Reply
Brice C. Jones link
04/30/2014 12:12pm

I should also add that, from what Jerry Pattengale (a nice chap) has personally told me, scholars working on items in the collection are required to mentor students in the process. But what about those scholars who are interested in working on items who do not wish to participate in the mentor-mentee program? I'm not saying this is a good or bad thing—it's just a question.

Reply
Pete Head
04/30/2014 12:41pm

Re consultants etc. check here: http://www.greenscholarsinitiative.org/scholars-staff
Re mummy masks: I don't have any direct knowledge of this that is relevant here. I gather that it is happening and it is in some respects a potentially exciting development that is facilitated by private ownership. Potentially important for palaeography because there are associations of literary and documentary texts.

Re the scholar mentor idea: yes this idea of giving students exposure to the manuscripts and the scholarly process is, as far as I can see, pretty integral to the GSI vision. Also they obviously have to approve of the scholar mentors (I'm not aware of all the grounds for whatever judgement they make here). At the moment it is a private collection.
Cheers

Pete Head

Reply
Brice C. Jones link
04/30/2014 1:03pm

Thanks, Pete!

Reply
Dave Lewis
05/03/2014 12:24am

Here is a bit of info on Shipman Rare Books LLC

http://www.wysk.com/index/texas/spring/cl4a3h6/shipman-rare-books-llc/profile#

and a bit more

http://www.wysk.com/search/doEntitySearch.cfm?q=8809%20Diceman%20Drive%20%20Dallas%20TX%2075218

The address on Diceman Drive is a little old house in a rundown suburb of Dallas.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013

    Categories

    All
    Ancient History
    Book Reviews
    Ebay Antiquities
    Egypt
    Historical Jesus
    Name That NT MS
    News
    Notes On Papyri
    Online Resources
    Textual Criticism
    Varia

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

© Brice C. Jones 2015. All rights reserved.